Message 66140 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	werneck
Recipients	tebeka, werneck
Date	2008-05-03.02:18:59
SpamBayes Score	0.16495965
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
That's expected as mktime is just a thin wrapper over libc mktime() and it does not expect microseconds. Changing time.mktime doesn't seems an option, so the best alternative is to implement a method in datetime type. Is there a real demand for C code implementing this to justify it?

That's expected as mktime is just a thin wrapper over libc mktime() and
it does not expect microseconds. Changing time.mktime doesn't seems an
option, so the best alternative is to implement a method in datetime
type. Is there a real demand for C code implementing this to justify it?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-03 02:19:00	werneck	set	spambayes_score: 0.16496 -> 0.16495965 recipients: + werneck, tebeka
2008-05-03 02:19:00	werneck	set	spambayes_score: 0.16496 -> 0.16496 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-05-03 02:18:59	werneck	link	issue2736 messages
2008-05-03 02:18:59	werneck	create