Message 68515 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rodolpho
Recipients	christian.heimes, rodolpho, stranger4good, werneck, zanella
Date	2008-06-21.16:50:46
SpamBayes Score	0.00023765632
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Verified Werneck's patch and it also works on 2.6 and 3.0. However, the previous code used to present a "friendly" message about non-numeric ports: "socket.error: nonnumeric port" and now it raises "ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10". Should it be changed to inform that the exception is due to a non-numeric port? (Just wrap int(port) with a try and change the raised exception)

Verified Werneck's patch and it also works on 2.6 and 3.0.

However, the previous code used to present a "friendly" message about
non-numeric ports: "socket.error: nonnumeric port" and now it raises
"ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10".

Should it be changed to inform that the exception is due to a
non-numeric port? (Just wrap int(port) with a try and change the raised
exception)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-06-21 16:51:39	rodolpho	set	spambayes_score: 0.000237656 -> 0.00023765632 recipients: + rodolpho, christian.heimes, stranger4good, zanella, werneck
2008-06-21 16:51:12	rodolpho	set	spambayes_score: 0.000237656 -> 0.000237656 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-06-21 16:50:51	rodolpho	link	issue2118 messages
2008-06-21 16:50:47	rodolpho	create