Message 70228 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	fredrikj, loewis, rhettinger
Date	2008-07-24.21:39:56
SpamBayes Score	0.25514093
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Another reason to leave frexp() untouched is that it is tightly coupled to ldexp() as its inverse, for a lossless roundtrip: assert ldexp(frexp(pi)) == pi This relationship is bound to get mucked-up or confused if frexp starts accepting large integers that are no exactly representable as floats (i.e. 2*100+1).

Another reason to leave frexp() untouched  is that it is tightly 
coupled to ldexp() as its inverse, for a lossless roundtrip:

  assert ldexp(*frexp(pi)) == pi

This relationship is bound to get mucked-up or confused if frexp starts 
accepting large integers that are no exactly representable as floats 
(i.e. 2**100+1).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-24 21:39:58	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.255141 -> 0.25514093 recipients: + rhettinger, loewis, fredrikj
2008-07-24 21:39:58	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.255141 -> 0.255141 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-07-24 21:39:57	rhettinger	link	issue3439 messages
2008-07-24 21:39:56	rhettinger	create