Message 71426 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jnoller
Recipients	barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan
Date	2008-08-19.15:36:29
SpamBayes Score	6.663709e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to	<[email protected]>

Content
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> added the comment: > > is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the > multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as > a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if > t.alive:" anyway. Dang, I already cut that one over.

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> added the comment:
>
> is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
> multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
> a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
> t.alive:" anyway.

Dang, I already cut that one over.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-19 15:36:30	jnoller	set	recipients: + jnoller, barry, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, mishok13
2008-08-19 15:36:29	jnoller	link	issue3352 messages
2008-08-19 15:36:29	jnoller	create