Message 72355 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, facundobatista, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date	2008-09-02.17:32:54
SpamBayes Score	0.00011110461
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I wonder if we shouldn't hold off on this. It's a substantial amount of new code. I'd be fine with it going into 3.0.1 since it's pure optimization (IIUC!). But right now we want burn-in, not new features.

I wonder if we shouldn't hold off on this. It's a substantial amount of
new code. I'd be fine with it going into 3.0.1 since it's pure
optimization (IIUC!). But right now we want burn-in, not new features.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-09-02 17:32:56	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, facundobatista, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou
2008-09-02 17:32:55	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-09-02 17:32:55	gvanrossum	link	issue2690 messages
2008-09-02 17:32:54	gvanrossum	create