Message 79147 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, christian.heimes, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou
Date	2009-01-05.13:59:07
SpamBayes Score	0.083163776
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Would it be possible to rework your code so as not to define two versions of Py_AddPendingCall() and Py_MakePendingCalls(), only putting `#ifdef WITH_THREAD` sections where it's necessary? Or would it make the code too quirky? Also, it would be nice to have a test for this specific feature (e.g. using a dedicated function in the _testcapi module), but perhaps it isn't a showstopper either.

Would it be possible to rework your code so as not to define two
versions of Py_AddPendingCall() and Py_MakePendingCalls(), only putting
`#ifdef WITH_THREAD` sections where it's necessary? Or would it make the
code too quirky?

Also, it would be nice to have a test for this specific feature (e.g.
using a dedicated function in the _testcapi module), but perhaps it
isn't a showstopper either.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-01-05 13:59:08	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, kristjan.jonsson, christian.heimes
2009-01-05 13:59:08	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-01-05 13:59:07	pitrou	link	issue4293 messages
2009-01-05 13:59:07	pitrou	create