Message 80390 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	jnoller, ndfred, pitrou, rhettinger
Date	2009-01-22.23:20:40
SpamBayes Score	0.0058159223
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
That's why I was suggesting to leave Queue as it is and provide a separate PriorityQueue. With a PriorityQueue the user is free to put (timestamp, object) tuples in it if he wants a strict chronologic ordering. He can also use sequence numbers instead of timestamps, etc.

That's why I was suggesting to leave Queue as it is and provide a
separate PriorityQueue. With a PriorityQueue the user is free to put
(timestamp, object) tuples in it if he wants a strict chronologic
ordering. He can also use sequence numbers instead of timestamps, etc.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-01-22 23:20:41	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, jnoller, ndfred
2009-01-22 23:20:41	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-01-22 23:20:40	pitrou	link	issue4999 messages
2009-01-22 23:20:40	pitrou	create