Message 80645 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mark.dickinson
Recipients	ezio.melotti, konryd, mark.dickinson, rhettinger
Date	2009-01-27.11:14:14
SpamBayes Score	0.00014536573
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
combinations_with_replacement addition looks good. Thank you. I wonder whether the second argument should be constrained to be an integer? I find the following a little surprising: >>> list(combinations_with_replacement(range(5), -0.3)) [()] (same behaviour with combinations and permutations). Should I open a separate issue for this, or is it just not worth changing?

combinations_with_replacement addition looks good.  Thank you.

I wonder whether the second argument should be constrained to be an
integer? I find the following a little surprising:

>>> list(combinations_with_replacement(range(5), -0.3))
[()]

(same behaviour with combinations and permutations).  Should I open a
separate issue for this, or is it just not worth changing?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-01-27 11:14:22	mark.dickinson	set	recipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, konryd
2009-01-27 11:14:22	mark.dickinson	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-01-27 11:14:15	mark.dickinson	link	issue5048 messages
2009-01-27 11:14:14	mark.dickinson	create