Message 84885 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gregory.p.smith
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, michael.foord, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger, skip.montanaro
Date	2009-03-31.20:01:26
SpamBayes Score	5.140525e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
trunk r70878 has the code issue an actual PendingDeprecationWarning for the fail* methods and documents them as deprecated. If anyone has a better idea of a better way to state those deprecations in the docs, feel free to jump in here. I was unaware of the PendingDeprecationWarning (ignored by default) prior to this. I think that is what Guido was suggesting. The question of if we can do an actual DeprecationWarning for 3.1 or not still stands.

trunk r70878 has the code issue an actual PendingDeprecationWarning for
the fail* methods and documents them as deprecated.  If anyone has a
better idea of a better way to state those deprecations in the docs,
feel free to jump in here.

I was unaware of the PendingDeprecationWarning (ignored by default)
prior to this.  I think that is what Guido was suggesting.  The question
of if we can do an actual DeprecationWarning for 3.1 or not still stands.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-03-31 20:01:28	gregory.p.smith	set	recipients: + gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, purcell, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, michael.foord
2009-03-31 20:01:28	gregory.p.smith	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-03-31 20:01:27	gregory.p.smith	link	issue2578 messages
2009-03-31 20:01:27	gregory.p.smith	create