Message85404
Patch attached.
No docs, if it is agreed I can apply I'll write docs.
After a long discussion we arrived at some semblance of consensus on the
Testing In Python mailing list that this was a good thing (tm).
Only one -1 (thought that cleanUp should be a method) and Holger Krekel
was only +0 because he thinks changes in unittest should be conservative
(but he isn't actually using it).
Many others were +1 - Fred Drake, Titus Brown, Laura Creighton, Robert
Collins, Jonathan Lange, Kumar McMillan and others.
It provides a clean and simple pattern for the cleaning up of resources
- avoiding the need for nested try finallys and the manual tracking of
resources. It can also avoid the need for duplication of cleanup code. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009-04-04 16:10:45 | michael.foord | set | recipients:
+ michael.foord, gregory.p.smith |
| 2009-04-04 16:10:44 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2009-04-04 16:10:43 | michael.foord | link | issue5679 messages |
| 2009-04-04 16:10:35 | michael.foord | create | |
|