Message 91289 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, gvanrossum, rhettinger
Date	2009-08-05.00:35:12
SpamBayes Score	9.797681e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see a problem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as long as they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spend effort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someone volunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting set literals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr() needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6.

Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see a
problem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as long
as they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spend
effort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someone
volunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting set
literals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr()
needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-08-05 00:35:14	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, brett.cannon, rhettinger, alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson
2009-08-05 00:35:14	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-08-05 00:35:13	gvanrossum	link	issue2335 messages
2009-08-05 00:35:12	gvanrossum	create