Message 99385 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.araujo
Recipients	andrewclegg, eric.araujo
Date	2010-02-16.05:02:10
SpamBayes Score	3.5640915e-09
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Hello The feature seems useful to me and the patch straightforward. I wonder why you used a global name for the max length (“_MAXCACHE”) instead of inlining the value where it is used. Does it feel more constanty? ;) I fear that the leading underscore won’t discourage users from touching it, so I’d suggest making it public or completely hidden. On second thought, you could argue that Python is a matter of consenting adults, and that leading underscore is okay. Regards

Hello

The feature seems useful to me and the patch straightforward.

I wonder why you used a global name for the max length (“_MAXCACHE”) instead of inlining the value where it is used. Does it feel more constanty? ;) I fear that the leading underscore won’t discourage users from touching it, so I’d suggest making it public or completely hidden. On second thought, you could argue that Python is a matter of consenting adults, and that leading underscore is okay.

Regards

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-02-16 05:02:13	eric.araujo	set	recipients: + eric.araujo, andrewclegg
2010-02-16 05:02:12	eric.araujo	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-02-16 05:02:10	eric.araujo	link	issue7846 messages
2010-02-16 05:02:10	eric.araujo	create