Skip to content

bpo-26707: make plistlib read UID Key-Archive data#5922

Closed
bigfootjon wants to merge 7 commits intopython:masterfrom
bigfootjon:fix-issue-26707
Closed

bpo-26707: make plistlib read UID Key-Archive data#5922
bigfootjon wants to merge 7 commits intopython:masterfrom
bigfootjon:fix-issue-26707

Conversation

@bigfootjon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bigfootjon bigfootjon commented Feb 27, 2018

Plistlib currently throws an exception when asked to decode a valid
.plist file that was generated by Apple's Key-Archiver. Specifically,
this is caused by a byte 0x80 (signifying a UID) not being read as an
integer.

https://bugs.python.org/issue26707

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@bigfootjon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ping @the-knights-who-say-ni
I've submitted my CLA

@bigfootjon bigfootjon closed this Mar 4, 2019
@bigfootjon bigfootjon deleted the fix-issue-26707 branch March 4, 2019 01:01
@bigfootjon bigfootjon restored the fix-issue-26707 branch March 4, 2019 01:02
@bigfootjon bigfootjon deleted the fix-issue-26707 branch March 4, 2019 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants